Using filters, but showing results directly?
Using filters, but showing results directly?
The filters work fine, they are great. Is there maybe a way to show the filter results immediately, without having to type a blank character? So clicking on the filter would directly show the results.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Here, with version 1.5, it already works like this.
Use the filter bar drop-down list.
______________________________________________________
Windows 11 Home x64 Version 22H2 (OS Build 22621.2215)
Everything 1.5.0.1356a (x64), Everything Toolbar 1.2
Use the filter bar drop-down list.
______________________________________________________
Windows 11 Home x64 Version 22H2 (OS Build 22621.2215)
Everything 1.5.0.1356a (x64), Everything Toolbar 1.2
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Yes, i have that side bar here, but when clicking on one of the filters does nothing. I have to type at least a blank/space character, until the results show up. Did i oversee some setting?
And i am using the latest alpha, of course.
And i am using the latest alpha, of course.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Seems like a misunderstanding. I don't mean to have a list already, when refining the results by clicking the item type filters, like "Audio". I mean a filter like ext:jpg;tiff;bmp; dm:4weeks, that i would like to show all results by just clicking on the filter field, so no search argument is given. Is that possible?
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
I created a filter with your search.abr01 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2023 1:44 pm Seems like a misunderstanding. I don't mean to have a list already, when refining the results by clicking the item type filters, like "Audio". I mean a filter like ext:jpg;tiff;bmp; dm:4weeks, that i would like to show all results by just clicking on the filter field, so no search argument is given. Is that possible?
Selecting that filter on the Filter bar works without any search argument.
So I don't see any problem here, it works as you want.
______________________________________________________
Windows 11 Home x64 Version 22H2 (OS Build 22621.2215)
Everything 1.5.0.1356a (x64), Everything Toolbar 1.2
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Thanks! I have no idea, why it doesn't work here, i still need that extra step. Version 1.5.0.1356a is used.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Now i found the reason. I prefer to have an empty list prior to the search. Therefore i use the option 'Hide results when the search is empty'. My suggestion is, to make custom filters act independently from this setting.
Extra option for custom filters
Would it be possible to use 'the 'Hide results when the search is empty' option for the normal search, to have a cleaner starting look in the window, but to have custom filters ignoring this setting? I prefer an empty start window, but when i use custom filters (user made), i'd prefer 'one click', instead of having to type a blank character to get the list. Basically an sub-option for 'Hide results when the search is empty', something like 'for the all files window only'.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Thank you for your reply abr01,
I'll add a search function to override the "hide results when the search is empty" setting.
You'll be able to use this function in your filter search.
For example:
no-hide-empty-search-results:
I'll make another post here once this is ready for testing.
I'll add a search function to override the "hide results when the search is empty" setting.
You'll be able to use this function in your filter search.
For example:
no-hide-empty-search-results:
I'll make another post here once this is ready for testing.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Merged posts.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Thanks a lot void! I don't know, if this option makes sense to other users, but maybe it does. Cool.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
What is the problem with the default to show results on opening a window.
It takes a few seconds to fill the display, and you even can set what sort is used by default.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
@horst.epp, it's not any kind of problem, but since that option was available, i preferred the cleaner look and got used to it, that's all. And you're right, there is no delay, when having the list displayed.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Yeah, that came to my mind too. At first i thought user made filters are distinct from the basic search. But yes, it's a nice way to give us an extra choice.
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
On second (or third) thought: The Everything filter is actually not a filter. An empty filter at best.
(I already say too many stupid things; one less is preferable )
Still: a clever solution ..
(I already say too many stupid things; one less is preferable )
Still: a clever solution ..
Re: Using filters, but showing results directly?
Everything 1.5.0.1357a adds a no-hide-empty-search-results: search function.
To set a filter to always show results, even when the search is empty, include the following in your filter search:
no-hide-empty-search-results:
For example:
To set a filter to always show results, even when the search is empty, include the following in your filter search:
no-hide-empty-search-results:
For example:
- In Everything, from the Search menu, click Organize filters....
- Select your custom filter and click Edit....
- Change the search to:
Code: Select all
no-hide-empty-search-results: ext:jpg;tiff;bmp; dm:4weeks
- Click OK.
- Click OK.